Cross-sectional study reveals multisite extraocular dryness links to symptomatic dry eye and tear-film instability in adults, highlighting systemic dryness as a potential clinical indicator.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a greater number of self-reported extraocular dryness sites is associated with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)-defined symptomatic dry eye and non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT)-defined tear-film instability among community-dwelling adults without severe meibomian gland loss. METHODS: This cross-sectional participant-level analysis used baseline data from the Beijing Adult Dry Eye Cohort (ADEC). Adults with complete OSDI, extraocular dryness, age, sex, and meibomian gland data were included if participant-level maximum upper- and lower-eyelid meibomian gland scores across both eyes were ≤ 2. Extraocular dryness was assessed using a study-specific four-site checklist, and the resulting site count was categorized as 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 sites. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated using modified Poisson regression with inference accounting for clustering by community. RESULTS: Among 675 participants, 270 (40.0%), 212 (31.4%), 106 (15.7%), and 87 (12.9%) reported 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 extraocular dryness sites, respectively. The crude prevalence of OSDI-defined symptomatic dry eye increased from 17.0% to 62.1%, and NIBUT-defined tear-film instability from 24.8% to 74.7%. Compared with the 0-site group, the 3-4-site group had adjusted prevalence ratios of 2.91 (95% CI, 1.95-4.34) for symptomatic dry eye and 2.55 (95% CI, 1.90-3.44) for tear-film instability. CONCLUSIONS: Multisite extraocular dryness was associated with higher prevalence of both symptomatic dry eye and tear-film instability in this community-based population without severe meibomian gland loss and may provide clinically relevant phenotypic information. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether the association has predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: