PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 8, 2026Heart

Direct transfer to primary percutaneous coronary intervention centres following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: longer term outcomes and influences on survival

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Although direct transfer to PPCI centres improves short-term outcomes in suspected acute coronary occlusion OHCA, practice remains heterogeneous and the impact on longer-term survival is unclear.

Does direct transfer to a PPCI centre improve survival in adults with OHCA and ST-elevation compared to indirect transfer?

Population

613 adults with OHCA, return of spontaneous circulation, and ST-elevation on post-arrest ECG

Comparison

Direct transfer to a PPCI centre vs indirect transfer via a non-PPCI hospital

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Follow-up

3 years

Key result

Direct transfer to a PPCI center following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 3-year mortality compared to indirect transfer (27.9% vs 41.3%; absolute risk difference 13.5%).

Authors

AHAlexander HuntDSD. ScholfieldJMJoseph Morris

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Direct transfer associated with lower OHCA mortality; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.

Key Points

  • To determine whether direct transfer of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ST-elevation to primary percutaneous coronary intervention centres improves short-term and long-term survival compared with indirect transfer via non-specialist hospitals.
  • Analyzed data from a national myocardial infarction registry for 613 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, return of spontaneous circulation, and post-arrest ST-elevation between April 2015 and September 2022.
  • Categorized patients into direct transfer to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention centre (N=359) or indirect transfer via a non-intervention hospital (N=254).
  • Evaluated all-cause mortality over a 3-year follow-up period using adjusted flexible parametric survival models with landmark analyses at 30 days and 1 year.
  • Direct transfer shortened median call-to-balloon time (134 min vs 222 min) and resulted in higher survival to hospital discharge (81% vs 68%).
  • Indirect transfer was associated with significantly increased 30-day mortality (adjusted HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.73), with excess risk attenuating and stabilizing after approximately 6 months.
  • Cumulative incidence of death at 3 years was 27.9% in the direct transfer cohort versus 41.3% in the indirect transfer cohort, representing an absolute risk difference of 13.5%.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=613)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does direct transfer to a PPCI centre improve survival in adults with OHCA and ST-elevation compared to indirect transfer?

P
Population
613 adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, return of spontaneous circulation, and ST-elevation, followed for up to 3 years.
E
Exposure
Direct transfer to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centre
C
Comparator
Indirect transfer via a non-PPCI hospital
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality at 3 yearshard clinical

Main Result

Absolute Risk Reduction: 13.5

Absolute Event Rate: 27.9% vs 41.3%

Absolute Risk Reduction: 13.5%

Direct transfer to PPCI centers for OHCA patients with ST-elevation significantly improves survival up to 3 years compared to indirect transfer, primarily driven by early in-hospital outcomes.

Cite This Study

Hunt et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ST-elevation (n=613). Direct transfer to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centre vs. Indirect transfer via a non-PPCI hospital was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 3 years (Absolute risk difference 13.5%). Direct transfer to a PPCI center following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 3-year mortality compared to indirect transfer (27.9% vs 41.3%; absolute risk difference 13.5%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9fd7ab58e84d0ff5b467a7https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2026-328408
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Key recommendations and evidence from the NICE guideline for the acute management of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction2013 · 19 citations
  2. 22025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines2025 · 562 citations
  3. 3Association of Silent Myocardial Infarction and Sudden Cardiac Death2019 · 94 citations
  4. 4Standard deviations and standard errors2005 · 883 citations