Why the study?
Although direct transfer to PPCI centres improves short-term outcomes in suspected acute coronary occlusion OHCA, practice remains heterogeneous and the impact on longer-term survival is unclear.
Does direct transfer to a PPCI centre improve survival in adults with OHCA and ST-elevation compared to indirect transfer?
Population
613 adults with OHCA, return of spontaneous circulation, and ST-elevation on post-arrest ECG
Comparison
Direct transfer to a PPCI centre vs indirect transfer via a non-PPCI hospital
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Follow-up
3 years
Key result
Direct transfer to a PPCI center following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 3-year mortality compared to indirect transfer (27.9% vs 41.3%; absolute risk difference 13.5%).
Authors
Loading...
Direct transfer associated with lower OHCA mortality; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Cohort (n=613)
Yes
Does direct transfer to a PPCI centre improve survival in adults with OHCA and ST-elevation compared to indirect transfer?
Absolute Risk Reduction: 13.5
Absolute Event Rate: 27.9% vs 41.3%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 13.5%
Direct transfer to PPCI centers for OHCA patients with ST-elevation significantly improves survival up to 3 years compared to indirect transfer, primarily driven by early in-hospital outcomes.
Hunt et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ST-elevation (n=613). Direct transfer to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centre vs. Indirect transfer via a non-PPCI hospital was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 3 years (Absolute risk difference 13.5%). Direct transfer to a PPCI center following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower 3-year mortality compared to indirect transfer (27.9% vs 41.3%; absolute risk difference 13.5%).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: