Why the study?
Does indirect transfer compared to direct transfer worsen onset-to-balloon time and mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Does indirect transfer compared to direct transfer worsen onset-to-balloon time and mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Indirect transfer of STEMI patients to PCI centers significantly prolongs onset-to-balloon time and increases the risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality compared to direct transfer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Indirect transfer associated with higher STEMI mortality; leaves open whether direct routing reduces death in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: It is recommended that not only door-to-balloon time but also prehospital delay for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be improved. We investigated the effect of prehospital transfer pathway on onset-to-balloon time and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from 540 consecutive patients with primary PCI for STEMI. Patient clinical data and mortality were compared between patients who visited the family physician or non-PCI-capable hospitals and were then transferred to PCI-capable centers (indirect transfer patients), and those who directly visited PCI-capable centers (direct transfer patients). Onset-to-balloon time was longer in indirect transfer patients than in direct transfer patients (mean, 270 min; range, 180-480 min vs. 180 min, 120-240 min; P<0.001). In addition, patient prognosis was evaluated on Cox proportional regression analysis. Cardiac death and all-cause death were significantly higher in indirect transfer patients (odds ratios [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 1.17-4.01, P=0.01; OR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.09-2.68, P=0.02). These results were confirmed using propensity score matching for adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with indirect transfer to regional emergency departments of PCI centers had longer onset-to-balloon time and worse prognosis than those with direct transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imori et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: