Simulation analysis demonstrates enhanced voltage stability and reduced equipment wear in distribution networks, suggesting improved reliability under heavy electric vehicle adoption.
The high penetration of renewable energy and the large-scale development of electric vehicles (EVs) have made voltage violations in distribution networks increasingly prominent. The flexible on-load tap changer (F-OLTC), combining mechanical coarse regulation and power-electronic stepless fine adjustment, offers advantages in both regulation range and speed. However, existing protection strategies fail to account for the impact of EV charging/discharging surges and the multi-physics coupling constraints of the equipment, making it difficult to coordinate voltage quality and equipment lifetime. This paper proposes an adaptive zonal cooperative protection strategy for the F-OLTC that accounts for EV charging/discharging characteristics. An integrated protection architecture is constructed that fuses EV state awareness and equipment health monitoring. A multi-feature fusion fault identification method is proposed to distinguish EV disturbances, external faults, and internal converter faults. A comprehensive margin index is established, and dynamic zoning is achieved based on feature-space clustering. A coordinated stepped and stepless adaptive voltage regulation protection is designed, with dynamic adjustment of thresholds and delays, and fast EV power support is dispatched during mechanical switching transients. Simulations on a modified IEEE 33-node system show that the proposed strategy reduces average voltage deviation by 46.2%, tap operations by 28.6%, voltage sag depth by 81%, recovery time by 70.8%, and network loss by 21.9%, effectively improving voltage quality and reducing mechanical stress on the switching devices, which is expected to contribute to extended maintenance intervals and improved equipment reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: