Spatial cross-validation reveals poor out-of-parish machine-learning prediction of maize yield across Ecuadorian farms, indicating standard survey and climate predictors fail to transfer to new...
Farm-level yield models are commonly evaluated using random train–test partitions; however, spatial dependence among geographically related observations can lead to overly optimistic estimates of predictive performance and may not adequately reflect generalization to unseen locations. This study evaluated whether supervised machine-learning models could predict farm-level hard dry maize yield in previously unseen parishes of Manabí, Ecuador. The response variable was record-level maize yield, while predictors included survey-derived farm, crop, producer, management, socioeconomic, and digital-access characteristics. Climate-enhanced models additionally included crop-season cumulative precipitation, longest dry spell, mean 2 m air temperature, and mean upper-layer soil moisture. The analysis comprised 518 sole-crop hard dry maize records representing 433 producers in 45 parishes. Elastic Net, Random Forest, and histogram-based gradient boosting models were compared with a training-fold mean benchmark using nested cross-validation grouped by parish. The mean observed yield was 4.09 t ha−1. The benchmark achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.534 t ha−1, whereas the best survey-only and survey-plus-climate models achieved MAE values of 1.535 and 1.548 t ha−1, respectively. For histogram-based gradient boosting, the estimated climate-related MAE reduction was −0.013 t ha−1 (−0.85%; parish-cluster bootstrap 95% CI: −0.061 to 0.036). All model configurations produced negative pooled R2 values. Random record-level validation yielded more favorable results, indicating potential spatial optimism. The findings do not imply that management practices or climate conditions are agronomically unimportant; rather, they indicate that the available survey data and parish-level climate variables were insufficient to support reliable yield prediction for individual crop records in previously unseen parishes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teresa Guarda (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: