Benchmarking study demonstrates reduced computational costs and enhanced routing accuracy using modular small language models, indicating viable alternatives to massive monolithic systems.
Large language models (LLMs) incur prohibitive computational costs when deployed as monolithic systems for multi-domain query processing. This paper proposes Accelerated LLM, a modular architecture that replaces a single general-purpose LLM with an ensemble of task-specialised small language models (SLMs) governed by a neural query router and a Mamdani fuzzy inference system. The router embeds each user query using a frozen sentence encoder and classifies it across four task domains—summarisation, translation, question answering, and text generation—routing confident queries directly to the corresponding SLM. Ambiguous queries are escalated to a three-input fuzzy logic system operating on Query Length, inter-Domain Overlap Score, and Classifier Confidence, enabling principled handling of imprecise inputs. A reinforcement-learning feedback loop, validated through a controlled pilot deployment, continuously refines the routing policy. The complete pipeline, including the sentence encoder, totals approximately 2.14 billion parameters—a 98.8% reduction relative to GPT-3.5 (175 B). The integration of fuzzy logic into the routing stage raises classification accuracy from 91.5% to 94.3% and reduces the hallucination rate to 9.8% (minor) and 6.4% (major). Evaluated on healthcare-augmented benchmarks against ChatGPT-3.5, Claude, Mistral 70B, and two contemporary compact models (GPT-4o-mini and Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct), Accelerated LLM achieves competitive or superior task-specific performance at a fraction of the parameter count. A small-scale pilot evaluation in the legal domain indicates that the routing and fuzzy logic components retain partial effectiveness beyond the primary healthcare setting, though full multi-domain validation remains future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: