Qualitative study reveals anticipatory grief spans past memories, present disruption, and future loss in cancer caregivers, highlighting the need for temporally tailored supportive care.
Anticipatory grief is a major psychological challenge for family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer. Understanding how caregivers make sense of this experience is essential for providing targeted support to this population. To explore the cognitive experiences of anticipatory grief among primary family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer in China. An interpretive phenomenological design was used. From July 2024 to September 2024, 19 primary family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer (age M = 63.42 years, SD = 12.25) were recruited and interviewed in two regional hospitals in Zhejiang, China. Transcripts were analysed inductively, with mental time travel used as a sensitising and interpretive lens. Three themes were identified: “Fading and mourning”, “Ambivalent choices”, and “Acceptance and meaning reconstruction”. Caregivers’ anticipatory grief was reflected in memories of the patient’s former health and shared life, present perceptions of relational separation and role disruption, and imagined futures marked by loss. They also described a continuing tension between holding on and letting go, while gradually reconstructing meaning through companionship, filial responsibility, acceptance of death, and the pursuit of a good death and good farewell. Interpreted through the lens of mental time travel, anticipatory grief among primary family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer is a cognitively and temporally organized experience, not merely an emotional response. Supportive care should attend to caregivers’ memories of past relationships, present role changes, future-oriented fears, and culturally embedded meaning-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: