Observational field study demonstrates that building shade governs microclimate regulation over unshaded vegetation in an arid courtyard, highlighting structural shading needs in hot climates.
The summer performance of Saharan residential courtyards in developer-built (“promotional”) housing remains poorly documented. This study characterises a representative courtyard in Laghouat, Algeria (Köppen BWk), enclosed by R+3 buildings, combining in situ measurement at five stations with ENVI-met simulation. All stations remained in the EXTREME physiological-stress category (PET = 51.1–52.3 °C), with a minimum relative humidity of 9.26–10.35%; the sky view factor correlated with thermal amplitude (r = 0.936) and building shading with humidity (r = 0.977) and PET (r = −0.887). A vegetation paradox emerges: the unshaded vegetated station recorded the highest thermal surplus and lowest humidity, consistent with stomatal closure under extreme aridity, whereas the same vegetation, façade-shaded, performed best. Building shading, not ground vegetation, is the primary regulator, with a 9.5 °C surface-temperature differential between the two. These findings, specific to this single, intensively characterised courtyard, translate into six ranked design suggestions, led by built shading targeting 60–70% coverage at peak hours and temporally modulated nocturnal ventilation; the resulting assessment framework—rather than its site-specific values—offers a structure transferable to Saharan collective housing more broadly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zebda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: