Comparative review demonstrates the viability of smart materials in bone prosthetics, highlighting personalized design strategies for clinical implants.
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of recent bioengineering advances in smart bone prosthetics. It covers the current research gap in the limitations of conventional implants and graft materials, as well as the impact of nanomaterials and their advancements. Emphasis is placed on integrating embedded sensors, adaptive control systems, and wireless monitoring into metallic, carbon-based, and bioceramic materials. The evaluation of essential characteristics of mechanical strength, durability, and biocompatibility is combined with the integration of smart functionality. The key mechanical properties, such as tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and fatigue life, are reviewed to assess how each material supports long-term prosthetic performance. Concurrently, biocompatibility factors, tissue integration and inflammatory response are examined to ensure safe and effective clinical application. The integrative approach can help clinicians and biomedical engineers to fine-tune the selection of the optimal material-smart system and provide individually tailored combinations to specific patient needs and surgical-operative contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herzog et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: