Key result
Simulated hypovolemia using lower body negative pressure significantly decreased both carotid (337 vs 360 ms) and digital (339 vs 361 ms) left ventricular ejection time at -10 mm Hg.
Why the study?
Does peripheral LVET measured via digital arterial waveform accurately reflect central LVET variations during simulated hypovolemia in healthy volunteers?
Does peripheral LVET measured via digital arterial waveform accurately reflect central LVET variations during simulated hypovolemia in healthy volunteers?
Peripheral LVET measured via digital arterial waveform accurately reflects central LVET variations during simulated hypovolemia, suggesting it could be a reliable noninvasive monitoring parameter.
Digital LVET tracks central changes during simulated hypovolemia; hypothesis-generating for noninvasive monitoring, requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured in central arteries is modified during hypovolemia. We compared modifications of the pulse wave in a central artery (carotid) and in a peripheral artery (digital) during central hypovolemia induced by lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in conscious volunteers. METHODS: Hypovolemia was simulated with progressive LBNP (baseline, -10, -20, and -30 mm Hg) in nine young healthy volunteers. The carotid arterial pressure waveform was recorded using a Millar tonometric method. The digital pulse wave was measured with a volume-clamp method (Finapres) and the stroke volume with a thoracic impedance method (Biomed). RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure did not change during LBNP. Compared with baseline values, heart rate increased significantly at the -30 mm Hg level (68 +/- 13 beats/min vs. 59 +/- 11 beats/min), and stroke volume decreased as soon as -10 mm Hg was achieved (113 +/- 41 mL vs. 127 +/- 35 mL). Both carotid and digital LVET decreased significantly at the -10 mm Hg level (337 +/- 26 and 339 +/- 24 ms vs. 360 +/- 35 and 361 +/- 24 ms, respectively). CONCLUSION: Peripheral LVET could reflect variation of central LVET during LBNP and be a reliable noninvasive parameter for monitoring hypovolemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geeraerts et al. (2004) studied Healthy (n=9). Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection time (LVET). Simulated hypovolemia using lower body negative pressure significantly decreased both carotid (337 vs 360 ms) and digital (339 vs 361 ms) left ventricular ejection time at -10 mm Hg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: