Key result
Higher medical comorbidity burden significantly predicted poorer clinical response and remission rates during 8-week fluoxetine treatment for major depressive disorder.
Why the study?
Does medical comorbidity impact the response to fluoxetine in outpatients with major depressive disorder?
Cohort (n=384)
Open-label
Does medical comorbidity impact the response to fluoxetine in outpatients with major depressive disorder?
The total burden of medical illness negatively predicts clinical outcome in the acute phase of fluoxetine treatment for major depressive disorder.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports screening for medical comorbidity when initiating fluoxetine in MDD; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve remission in prospective trials.
Objective: The authors investigated the impact of medical comorbidity on the acute phase of antidepressant treatment in subjects with major depressive disorder. Method: A total of 384 outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder enrolled in 8-week open treatment with fluoxetine, 20 mg/day. The authors used the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale to measure the burden of medical comorbidity and the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression to assess changes in depressive symptoms. The outcome measures were response to treatment (≥50% reduction in score) and clinical remission (score ≤7 at the end of the trial). Results: Compared to responders to fluoxetine, nonresponders had significantly higher Cumulative Illness Rating Scale scores and a greater number of Cumulative Illness Rating Scale categories were endorsed. Compared to subjects who achieved remission with antidepressant treatment, those who did not achieve remission had significantly higher Cumulative Illness Rating Scale scores and a greater number of Cumulative Illness Rating Scale categories were endorsed (i.e., more organs were affected by medical illness). The final Hamilton depression scale score was directly correlated with the total Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score and the number of Cumulative Illness Rating Scale categories endorsed. Conclusions: The total burden of medical illness and the number of organ systems affected by medical illness had a significantly negative predictive value for clinical outcome in the acute phase of treatment in major depressive disorder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iosifescu et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Major depressive disorder (n=384). Medical comorbidity was evaluated on Response to treatment (≥50% reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score) and clinical remission (score ≤7). Higher medical comorbidity burden significantly predicted poorer clinical response and remission rates during 8-week fluoxetine treatment for major depressive disorder.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: