Key result
Among patients with ischemic heart disease and ASA hypersensitivity, 10 of 163 reacted to ASA challenge and the desensitization failure rate was 1.4%.
Why the study?
What are the clinical criteria for eligibility and safety of ASA challenge and desensitization in patients with ischemic heart disease and NSAID hypersensitivity?
Observational (n=310)
Yes
What are the clinical criteria for eligibility and safety of ASA challenge and desensitization in patients with ischemic heart disease and NSAID hypersensitivity?
In patients with ischemic heart disease and ASA hypersensitivity, ASA challenge is advisable for stable patients with nonsevere reactions, while direct desensitization is recommended for ACS patients, especially those reacting to low doses.
May guide ASA challenge eligibility in CAD with hypersensitivity; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) constitutes a serious problem for subjects with coronary artery disease. In such subjects, physicians have to choose the more appropriate procedure between challenge and desensitization. As the literature on this issue is sparse, this study aimed to establish in these subjects clinical criteria for eligibility for an ASA challenge and/or desensitization. METHODS: Collection and analysis of data on ASA challenges and desensitizations from 10 allergy centers, as well as consensus among the related physicians and an expert panel. RESULTS: Altogether, 310 subjects were assessed; 217 had histories of urticaria/angioedema, 50 of anaphylaxis, 26 of nonimmediate cutaneous eruptions, and 17 of bronchospasm related to ASA/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) intake. Specifically, 119 subjects had index reactions to ASA doses lower than 300 mg. Of the 310 subjects, 138 had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 101 of whom underwent desensitizations, whereas 172 suffered from a chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD), 126 of whom underwent challenges. Overall, 163 subjects underwent challenges and 147 subjects underwent desensitizations; 86 of the latter had index reactions to ASA doses of 300 mg or less. Ten subjects reacted to challenges, seven at doses up to 500 mg, three at a cumulative dose of 110 mg. The desensitization failure rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable CIHD and histories of nonsevere hypersensitivity reactions to ASA/NSAIDs, an ASA challenge is advisable. Patients with an ACS and histories of hypersensitivity reactions to ASA, especially following doses lower than 100 mg, should directly undergo desensitization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cortellini et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease with hypersensitivity to ASA/NSAIDs (n=310). ASA challenge or desensitization was evaluated on Reaction to challenge and desensitization failure rate. Among patients with ischemic heart disease and ASA hypersensitivity, 10 of 163 reacted to ASA challenge and the desensitization failure rate was 1.4%.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: