Key result
Diabetes prevention program enrollment lags expectations, achieving only 14% conversion vs 25% expected.
Why the study?
Does a diabetes prevention cascade model identify gaps in the process of managing patients with prediabetes?
Observational (n=70,911)
Yes
Does a diabetes prevention cascade model identify gaps in the process of managing patients with prediabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A diabetes prevention cascade model highlights that despite high referral rates, enrollment conversion rates for diabetes prevention programs remain low, identifying a key area for quality improvement.
Introduction A conceptual cascade model was developed to track diabetes prevention efforts in the process for managing patients with prediabetes and compared with observed data from healthcare organizations. Methods The cascade tracked patients eligible for diabetes prevention at each level of the cascade derived from multiple data sources. This was aligned with eligible (aggregated) data from 3 pilot healthcare organizations ( n =70,911), including disproportionately affected population of both Black and Hispanic women ( n =18,079). Results Healthcare organizations had higher screening eligibility than expected (43% vs 35%). Laboratory tests ordered were lower than expected for the total population (42% vs 60%) and aligned well for the disproportionately affected population (57% vs 60%). Ranges for prediabetes laboratory tests were close to expected for the total (38% vs 35%) and disproportionately affected population (39% vs 35%). Referral rates were higher (assuming awareness of the condition) in the total (188% vs 25%) and disproportionately affected population (264% vs 25%). Conversion rates from referral to enrollment were lower than expected in the total (14% vs 25%) and disproportionately affected population (13% vs 25%). Conclusions Despite increased referral rates, there is still a need to improve the enrollment conversion rate. Feedback from the conceptual model to observed data can provide critical findings to facilitate diabetes prevention efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Prediabetes (n=70,911). Diabetes prevention cascade model tracking vs. Expected rates from conceptual model was evaluated on Conversion rates from referral to enrollment. Observed conversion rates from referral to enrollment in diabetes prevention programs were lower than expected in the total population and disproportionately affected groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: