BACKGROUND: Whereas in the past, androgens were mainly believed to exert adverse effects on the cardiovascular system, recent experimental data postulate a benefit of testosterone for recovery of myocardial function after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Thus, we examined whether testosterone might improve myocardial tolerance to ischemia due to activation of mitochondrial (mitoK(ATP)) and/or sarcoplasmatic (sarcK(ATP)) K(ATP) channels. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a cellular model of ischemia, testosterone significantly decreased the rate of ischemia-induced death of cardiomyocytes that could be prevented by 5-hydroxydecainoic acid but was unaffected by the sarcK(ATP) blocker HMR1098 and the testosterone receptor antagonist flutamide. To index mitoK(ATP), mitochondrial flavoprotein fluorescence was measured. Testosterone induced a highly significant increase in mitochondrial flavoprotein fluorescence in intact myocytes and isolated mitoplasts that could be abolished by 5-hydroxydecainoic acid. Testosterone-mediated flavoprotein oxidation of mitoplasts was K+ dependent and ATP sensitive. In mitoplast-attached single-channel recordings, testosterone directly activated an ATP-sensitive K+ channel of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Addition of the K(ATP) channel opener diazoxide and pinacidil to the cytosolic solution activated the ATP-sensitive K+ current comparable to testosterone, whereas 5-hydroxydecainoic acid and glibenclamide inhibited the testosterone-induced current. Patch-clamp experiments of intact myocytes in whole-cell configuration did not demonstrate any effect of testosterone on sarcK(ATP) channels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide direct evidence for the existence of cardiac mitoK(ATP) and a link between testosterone-induced cytoprotection and activation of mitoK(ATP). Endogenous testosterone might play a more important role in recovery after myocardial infarction than is currently assumed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Er et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: