Four metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are synthesized using two different metal centers and two different organic ligands, viz., Cu 3 [C 6 H 3 (CO 2 ) 3 ] 2 (Cu-BTC), Cu[O 2 C–C 6 H 4 –CO 2 ] (Cu-BDC), Cr(OH)[O 2 C–C 6 H 4 –CO 2 ] (Cr-BDC), and Cr 3 F(H 2 O) 3 O[C 6 H 3 (CO 2 ) 3 ] 2 (Cr-BTC). Their adsorption behaviors for thiophenic sulfurs in model diesel oils are systematically investigated at mild temperatures and follow the order Cu-BTC > Cr-BDC > Cr-BTC ≫ Cu-BDC. Meanwhile, the adsorption capacity of different sulfur compounds follows the order dibenzothiophene (DBT) > benzothiophene (BT) > 3-methylthiophene (3-MT). The MOFs adsorption mechanism is regarded as a combined effect of many factors involving appropriate framework structure, suitable pore size and shape, and exposed Lewis acid site matching the S-compound to be adsorbed. The difference in adsorptive activity among the organosulfurs is mainly ascribed to their π-electron number and the electron density on the S-atom. Finally, the used MOF can be easily regenerated by solvent washing and recycled at least five times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: