Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual review demonstrates adaptation strategies mitigate systemic vulnerability in the tourism sector, indicating that long-term survival requires transformation rather than simple recovery.
The tourism sector is an important contributor to economic growth, employment, investment, and regional development. However, its strong dependence on international mobility, consumer confidence, economic stability, and geopolitical conditions makes it particularly vulnerable to crises. Pandemics, economic downturns, armed conflicts, natural disasters, and climate-related events can significantly disrupt tourism demand and supply. In this context, economic resilience has become an essential component of effective tourism management. This article examines the main management strategies and adaptation mechanisms that can strengthen the economic resilience of the tourism sector during crises. Particular attention is given to financial flexibility, market diversification, digital transformation, crisis preparedness, workforce adaptability, institutional cooperation, and sustainable tourism. The article argues that resilience should not be limited to the ability to recover from a crisis but should also include the capacity to adapt and transform tourism systems in response to changing conditions. A proactive resilience-oriented approach can reduce vulnerability, support faster recovery, and strengthen the long-term competitiveness and sustainability of tourism destinations and enterprises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bibilashvili et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: