Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The bZip proteins GCN4 and C/EBP differ in their DNA binding specificities: GCN4 binds well to the pseudopalindromic AP1 site 5'-A4T3G2A1C0T1C2'A3'T4'-3' and to the palindromic ATF/CREB sequence 5'-A4T3G2A1-C0*G0'T1'C2'A3'T4'-3'; C/EBP preferentially recognizes the palindromic sequence 5'-A4T3T2G1C0*G0'C1'A2'-A3'T4'-3'. According to the X-ray structures of GCN4-DNA complexes, five residues of the basic region of GCN4 are involved in specific base contacts: asparagine -18, alanine -15, alanine -14, serine -11 and arginine -10 (numbered relative to the start point of the leucine zipper, which we define as +1). In the basic region of C/EBP position -14 is occupied by valine instead of alanine, the other four residues being identical. Here we analyse the role of valine -14 in C/EBP-DNA complex formation. Starting from a C/EBP-GCN4 chimeric bZip peptide which displays C/EBP specificity, we systematically mutated position -14 of its basic region and characterized the DNA binding specificities of the 20 possible different peptides by gel mobility shift assays with various target sites. We present evidence that valine -14 of C/EBP interacts more strongly with thymine 2 than with cytosine 1' of the C/EBP binding site, unlike the corresponding alanine -14 of GCN4, which exclusively contacts thymine 1' of the GCN4 binding sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koldin et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: