Key result
Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction independently predicted long-term survival in CABG patients (HR 0.97; p=0.004), whereas intra-operative bypass graft flow failed to predict mortality.
Why the study?
Does intra-operative bypass graft flow measurement or preoperative LVEF predict long-term mortality in CABG patients?
Cohort (n=1,593)
Does intra-operative bypass graft flow measurement or preoperative LVEF predict long-term mortality in CABG patients?
Preoperative LVEF measured by echocardiography is a stronger predictor of long-term mortality after CABG than intra-operative bypass graft flow measurements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preoperative LVEF aids CABG risk stratification; leaves open whether graft flow improves mortality prediction.
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to analyze the predictive value of intra-operative bypass graft flow measurements for long-term mortality. METHODS: A total of 1593 consecutive coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients routinely underwent intra-operative bypass graft flow measurements with the transit-time flow meter (TTFM: Cardiomed(®)). The results of the flow measurements and the demographics were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 3.8 years (0.5-8.8 years) with no losses to follow-up. Overall mortality was 10.1%. The preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (echocardiograph) was the highest independent predictor of long-term survival (hazard ratio 0.97, p = 0.004) in all groups. The univariate analysis for the CABG I group showed that besides LVEF, female gender (hazard ratio 3.6, p = 0.02) was also significant. For the CABG II group, additive EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk) (ES) (hazard ratio 1.4, p = 0.0001) and age (hazard ratio 1.1, p = 0.001) were significant. In the CABG III group, ES (hazard ratio 1.2, p < 0.0001), age (hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.001), IMA (hazard ratio 0.5, p < 0.0001) and concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) (hazard ratio 2.1, p = 0.03) were significant, in addition to the LVEF. CONCLUSION: With quality-controlled surgeons checked by intra-operative TTFM, accurate quantification of preoperative LVEF significantly predicts long-term outcome. Effective bypass graft flows failed to predict outcome in CABG patients, regardless of the degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant AVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beran et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG (n=1,593). Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated on Long-term survival (HR 0.97, p=0.004). Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction independently predicted long-term survival in CABG patients (HR 0.97; p=0.004), whereas intra-operative bypass graft flow failed to predict mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: