Key result
In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI, the presence of diabetes mellitus did not significantly increase the hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events (5% vs 5%, p=0.985) compared to patients without diabetes.
Why the study?
Does the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus affect in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute STEMI?
Cohort (n=721)
No
Does the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus affect in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute STEMI?
Primary PCI is effective and safe for STEMI patients with type 2 diabetes, with similar in-hospital major adverse cardiac events compared to non-diabetic patients, despite a higher risk of no-reflow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar in-hospital MACE after primary PCI for STEMI regardless of diabetes; cohort data leaves open targeted no-reflow strategies in trials.
AIM: to investigate the specific features and results of percutaneous interventions (PCI) into the coronary arteries in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in clinical practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A study group consisted of 120 patients with a history of type 2 DM, who had undergone primary PCI in 2008 to 2013. A comparison group included 601 patients without a history of DM. RESULTS: Assessment of the results of hospital interventions revealed no differences between the study and comparison groups in mortality rates (4.1 and 3.2%, respectively; p=0.376), stent thromboses (0.8 and 1.2%, respectively; p=0.601), and recurrent MI (0 and 1.5%, respectively; p=0.189). No differences were determined in the combined index including death, recurrent MI, and stent thrombosis (5 and 5%; p=0.985). At the same time, the no-reflow phenomenon developed statistically significantly more frequently in the patients with DM (7.4 and 2.8%; p=0.019). Binary logistic regression established independent associations between the presence of DM and patient age (odds ratio (OR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.07; p<0.001), female sex (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.56; p<0.001), and higher body mass index (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16; p<0.04). CONCLUSION: Primary PCIs in patients with DM are an effective and safe method for revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation MI and these are not followed by increases in mortality and frequency of major poor cardiac complications at the hospital stage despite the more common development of the no-reflow phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Бессонов et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=721). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (death, recurrent MI, stent thrombosis) during hospital stay (p=0.985). In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI, the presence of diabetes mellitus did not significantly increase the hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events (5% vs 5%, p=0.985) compared to patients without diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: