Key result
A cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention increased the time smoke-free compared to usual care in women hospitalized with cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Does a nurse-managed cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention delay resumption of smoking in women hospitalized with cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=277)
Yes
Does a nurse-managed cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention delay resumption of smoking in women hospitalized with cardiovascular disease?
A nurse-managed cognitive behavioral intervention delayed the resumption of smoking in women hospitalized with CVD, although long-term point prevalence of nonsmoking was similar to usual care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports nurse-managed CBT relapse prevention after CVD hospitalization in women; extends prior cessation trials to this high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: Although men hospitalized with cardiovascular disease (CVD) show high smoking-cessation rates, similar data for women are lacking. We tested the efficacy of smoking-cessation intervention in women hospitalized for CVD. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized controlled trial conducted from 1996 to 2001, 277 women diagnosed with CVD (mean age 61+/-10 years) were randomly assigned within 1 of 12 San Francisco Bay Area hospitals to a usual-care group (UG; n=135) or intervention group (IG; n=142). Baseline histories were obtained, and interviews to ascertain self-reported smoking status occurred at 6, 12, 24, and 30 months after hospitalization. The UG received strong physician's advice, a self-help pamphlet, and a list of community resources. The IG received strong physician's advice and a nurse-managed cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention at bedside, with telephone contact at intervals after discharge. The groups were similar demographically and had smoked cigarettes for a median of 38 (IG) or 40 (UG) years. Time to resumption of continuous smoking was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk differences between groups were determined. Time smoke-free was significantly greater for the IG than the UG (P=0.038). Point prevalence for nonsmoking at the interviews was somewhat greater for the IG than the UG (P>0.15 at all times). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioral intervention resulted in longer average times to resumption of smoking, but in these 2 groups of older women with limited social and financial resources, long-term success rates were similar. Systematic identification of smokers and even the brief intervention afforded the UG yielded a high smoking-cessation rate over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Froelicher et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease (n=277). Cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention vs. Usual care (physician's advice, self-help pamphlet, and community resources) was evaluated on Time to resumption of continuous smoking (p=0.038). A cognitive behavioral relapse-prevention intervention increased the time smoke-free compared to usual care in women hospitalized with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: