Key result
The transition from thrombolysis to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI in the UK presents both challenges and new opportunities for acute cardiac nurses.
Explores the implications and opportunities for acute cardiac nurses as primary PCI replaces thrombolysis for STEMI in the UK.
While particular titles and job roles vary, acute cardiac nurses or ‘thrombolysis nurses’ have been highly influential in ensuring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receive thrombolysis therapy with the minimum delay. If primary percutaneous coronary intedrvention (PCI) replaces thrombolysis as the chief reperfusion treatment in the UK in future—which seems likely—then this will inevitably have implications for those nurses for whom thrombolysis activity is a key responsibility. This paper explores some of these issues and discusses potential opportunities related to this change in reperfusion services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gamon et al. (2007) conducted a review in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Thrombolysis was evaluated. The transition from thrombolysis to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI in the UK presents both challenges and new opportunities for acute cardiac nurses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: