Key result
A genome-wide association study identified 35 common variant loci that collectively explain ~8-10% of QT-interval variation, highlighting the role of calcium signaling in myocardial repolarization.
Observational (n=100,000)
This large-scale GWAS identifies 35 loci associated with the QT interval, highlighting the importance of calcium regulation in myocardial repolarization and providing new candidate genes for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.
The QT interval, an electrocardiographic measure reflecting myocardial repolarization, is a heritable trait. QT prolongation is a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) and could indicate the presence of the potentially lethal mendelian long-QT syndrome (LQTS). Using a genome-wide association and replication study in up to 100,000 individuals, we identified 35 common variant loci associated with QT interval that collectively explain ∼8-10% of QT-interval variation and highlight the importance of calcium regulation in myocardial repolarization. Rare variant analysis of 6 new QT interval-associated loci in 298 unrelated probands with LQTS identified coding variants not found in controls but of uncertain causality and therefore requiring validation. Several newly identified loci encode proteins that physically interact with other recognized repolarization proteins. Our integration of common variant association, expression and orthogonal protein-protein interaction screens provides new insights into cardiac electrophysiology and identifies new candidate genes for ventricular arrhythmias, LQTS and SCD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arking et al. (2014) conducted an observational in QT interval variation (n=100,000). Genetic variants was evaluated on QT interval variation. A genome-wide association study identified 35 common variant loci that collectively explain ~8-10% of QT-interval variation, highlighting the role of calcium signaling in myocardial repolarization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: