Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The best management of patients with a popliteal aneurysm has yet to be established. This paper describes an experience of managing both patent and acutely thrombosed popliteal aneurysms. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out of all patients who presented with a popliteal aneurysm from January 1988 to December 2001. Since 1993 asymptomatic popliteal aneurysms less than 3 cm in diameter without distortion have been managed conservatively. Ultrasonography was repeated at 6-month intervals. These results were compared with conservative management of popliteal aneurysms greater than 3 cm in diameter in patients who declined or were unfit for operation, and with the outcome of patients who underwent elective bypass of a popliteal aneurysm. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (two women) presented with 92 popliteal aneurysms. Some 39 had a thrombosed aneurysm and these patients were significantly more likely to have bilateral aneurysms (P < 0.001). Of patent popliteal aneurysms managed conservatively, none below 3 cm in diameter thrombosed. The risk of postoperative complications was greater after repair of a thrombosed than a patent aneurysm (P < 0.005). Preoperative lysis for a thrombosed popliteal aneurysm was associated with more complications than operation and on-table lysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Careful monitoring of asymptomatic popliteal aneurysms less than 3 cm in diameter is safe. Preoperative lysis is associated with increased risks compared with operation alone in patients with a thrombosed popliteal aneurysm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galland et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: