Key result
24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring revealed abnormalities in 71.4% of 493 recordings, but urgent or significant abnormalities were present in only 1.4% and 14.6% of cases, respectively.
Why the study?
What is the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring in routine practice?
Observational (n=493)
What is the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring in routine practice?
24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring frequently detects abnormalities, but these rarely correlate with patient symptoms, suggesting potential overuse or low diagnostic yield for symptom correlation.
Low urgent yield questions routine 24-hour ECG use; leaves open refined selection criteria for higher diagnostic utility.
In total, 493 ambulatory ECG recordings were studied. Women were preponderant (62.3% vs 37.7%). The average age of women and men patients was 66.9 and 64.7 years, respectively. Of the ECGs studied, 71.4% showed abnormalities and 28.6% appeared completely normal. Urgent abnormalities were noted in 1.4% of the recordings and significant abnormalities were present in 14.6%. Subjective complaints were noted in their logbooks by 18.8% of patients, but correlation of complaints with the electrocardiographic abnormalities was noted in only 1.2% of cases. The attending cardiologist concluded that 23.9% of the tests supported reasons of valid necessity for performance. Two hundred seventy-three recordings were classified as electrocardiographically abnormal (55.4%) but were clinically insignificant. General practitioners requested 59.8% of the tests versus 40.2% by specialists. Preponderant abnormalities included premature atrial and ventricular contractions, supraventricular tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation. Less frequent abnormalities included ventricular tachycardia (4.6%), atrial flutter, atrioventricular block, artificial pacemaker rhythm, nodal rhythm, and intermittent bundle branch block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basil M. RuDusky (2003) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing ambulatory ECG monitoring (n=493). 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring was evaluated on Electrocardiographic abnormalities. 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring revealed abnormalities in 71.4% of 493 recordings, but urgent or significant abnormalities were present in only 1.4% and 14.6% of cases, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: