Key result
Internet-based e-counseling fails to improve 12-month KCCQ-OS over conventional e-based education in CHF patients.
Why the study?
International task force statements advocate telehealth programs to promote health-related quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure, prompting evaluation of an automated e-counseling program.
Does internet-based e-counseling improve 12-month KCCQ-OS in patients with chronic heart failure compared to conventional e-based education?
Population
231 patients with chronic heart failure
Comparison
Usual care plus e-counseling vs usual care plus e-based conventional CHF self-care education
Design
Multi-site double-blind randomized trial
Follow-up
12-month
Authors
Loading...
E-counseling confers no QoL benefit over e-education in chronic HF; challenges assumptions about automated digital interventions.
RCT (n=231)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does internet-based e-counseling improve 12-month KCCQ-OS in patients with chronic heart failure compared to conventional e-based education?
Absolute Event Rate: 29.6% vs 34%
p-value: p=0.51
An automated e-counseling program did not significantly improve 12-month quality of life (KCCQ-OS) compared to conventional e-based education in patients with chronic heart failure, although it did increase program engagement.
Nolan et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (CHF) (n=231). internet-based e-counseling vs. e-based conventional CHF self-care education (e-UC) was evaluated on 12-month Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) increase ≥5 points (p=0.51). Internet-based e-counseling did not significantly improve the 12-month KCCQ-OS by ≥5 points compared to conventional e-based education in patients with chronic heart failure (29.6% vs 34.0%, P=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: