Key result
Combining the coronary artery calcium score with coronary computed tomography angiography significantly improved the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with CCTA alone (AUC 87% vs 80%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
The added diagnostic value of combining CCTA with CAC score for detecting obstructive CAD in patients with stable chest pain was unknown.
Does combining CCTA with CAC score improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA alone in patients with stable chest pain?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,315)
Yes
Does combining CCTA with CAC score improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA alone in patients with stable chest pain?
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 80%
p-value: p=<0.001
Adding CAC score to CCTA significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD in patients with stable chest pain compared to CCTA alone.
OBJECTIVES: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has higher diagnostic accuracy than coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain, while the added diagnostic value of combining CCTA with CAC is unknown. We investigated whether combining coronary CCTA with CAC score can improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA alone. METHODS: A total of 2315 patients (858 women, 37%) aged 61.1 ± 10.2 from 29 original studies were included to build two CAD prediction models based on either CCTA alone or CCTA combined with the CAC score. CAD was defined as at least 50% coronary diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. Models were built by using generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept set for the original study. The two CAD prediction models were compared by the likelihood ratio test, while their diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Net benefit (benefit of true positive versus harm of false positive) was assessed by decision curve analysis. RESULTS: CAD prevalence was 43.5% (1007/2315). Combining CCTA with CAC improved CAD diagnosis compared with CCTA alone (AUC: 87% [95% CI: 86 to 89%] vs. 80% [95% CI: 78 to 82%]; p < 0.001), likelihood ratio test 236.3, df: 1, p < 0.001, showing a higher net benefit across almost all threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION: Adding the CAC score to CCTA findings in patients with stable chest pain improves the diagnostic performance in detecting CAD and the net benefit compared with CCTA alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CAC scoring CT performed before coronary CTA and included in the diagnostic model can improve obstructive CAD diagnosis, especially when CCTA is non-diagnostic. KEY POINTS: • The combination of coronary artery calcium with coronary computed tomography angiography showed significantly higher AUC (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 86 to 89%) for diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to coronary computed tomography angiography alone (80%, 95% CI: 78 to 82%, p < 0.001). • Diagnostic improvement was mostly seen in patients with non-diagnostic C. • The improvement in diagnostic performance and the net benefit was consistent across age groups, chest pain types, and genders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Stable chest pain with suspected coronary artery disease (n=2,315). Combination of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score vs. CCTA alone was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease measured by Area Under the Receiver-Operating-Characteristic Curve (AUC) (p=<0.001). Combining the coronary artery calcium score with coronary computed tomography angiography significantly improved the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease compared with CCTA alone (AUC 87% vs 80%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: