Key result
Working with EGS surgeons is linked to ~66% greater consultant support for their use.
Why the study?
The study aimed to survey consultants' experience of working as or with emergency general surgery surgeons and investigate the role they fulfil in managing general and subspeciality emergencies.
Comparison
Consultants working with emergency general surgery surgeons vs those without them
Design
Electronic survey
Authors
Loading...
Survey supports EGS surgeons for subspecialist relief in emergencies; leaves open sustainability, quality, and training concerns.
Cross-Sectional (n=242)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 78% vs 47%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Consultants working with emergency general surgeons are supportive of their role in relieving pressure on subspecialists, though concerns remain regarding the quality and sustainability of the role.
Symons et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Emergency general surgery (n=242). Working with emergency general surgery (EGS) surgeons vs. Working without EGS surgeons was evaluated on Support for the use of EGS surgeons (p=< 0.001). Consultants working with emergency general surgery (EGS) surgeons were significantly more likely to support their use compared to those without them (78% vs 47%, P < 0.001).