PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology210 citations

Use of a Wearable Defibrillator in Terminating Tachyarrhythmias in Patients at High Risk for Sudden Death:

View Full Paper
AFArthur M. FeldmanHKHelmut KleinPTPatrick Tchou

Key Result

A wearable cardioverter defibrillator successfully terminated tachyarrhythmias in 75% (6 of 8) of attempts, with inappropriate shocks occurring at a rate of 0.67% per month of use.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=289)

Structured PICO

Does a wearable cardioverter defibrillator successfully terminate tachyarrhythmias in patients at high risk for sudden death who are not candidates for an implantable device?

P
Population
289 patients at high risk for sudden death due to symptomatic heart failure with EF <0.30 or post-MI/bypass complications, who were not candidates for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
I
Intervention
Wearable cardioverter defibrillator
O
Outcome
Successful defibrillation attemptshard clinical

A wearable cardioverter defibrillator can successfully detect and terminate ventricular tachyarrhythmias in high-risk patients who are not immediate candidates for an ICD, serving as a potential bridge to permanent therapy.

Limitations

  • 68 patients quit due to comfort issues or adverse reactions.
  • 5 sudden deaths occurred while patients were not wearing the device and 1 while incorrectly wearing it.

Abstract

The automatic ICD improves survival in patients with a history of sudden cardiac arrest. However, some patients do not meet the guidelines for ICD implantation or are unable to receive an implantable device. This study tested the hypothesis that these patients could benefit from a wearable cardioverter defibrillator. Patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ejection fraction of <0.30 (WEARIT Study) or patients having complications associated with high risk for sudden death after a myocardial infarction or bypass surgery not receiving an ICD for up to 4 months (BIROAD Study) were enrolled into two studies. After a total of 289 patients had been enrolled in the trial (177 in WEARIT and 112 in BIROAD), prespecified safety and effectiveness guidelines had been met. Six (75%) of eight defibrillation attempts were successful. Six inappropriate shock episodes occurred during 901 months of patient use (0.67% unnecessary shocks per month of use). Twelve deaths occurred during the study 6 sudden deaths: 5 not wearing and 1 incorrectly wearing the device). Most patients tolerated the device although 68 patients quit due to comfort issues or adverse reactions. The results of the present study suggest that a wearable defibrillator is beneficial in detecting and effectively treating ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients at high risk for sudden death who are not clear candidates for an ICD and may be useful as a bridge to transplantation or ICD in some patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feldman et al. (2004) conducted an observational in High risk for sudden death (n=289). Wearable cardioverter defibrillator was evaluated on Successful defibrillation attempts. A wearable cardioverter defibrillator successfully terminated tachyarrhythmias in 75% (6 of 8) of attempts, with inappropriate shocks occurring at a rate of 0.67% per month of use.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa10fad96c8fbb7e31a079ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00378.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper