Key result
Wearable electronic devices measuring physiologic parameters showed significant positive associations with self-reporting pain scales for chronic pain assessment.
Why the study?
Little evidence exists regarding the use of wearable electronic devices and the physiologic parameters they measure for chronic pain intensity assessment.
Do wearable electronic devices accurately assess chronic pain intensity compared to self-reporting scales?
Systematic Review
Do wearable electronic devices accurately assess chronic pain intensity compared to self-reporting scales?
Wearable electronic devices show promise in objectively assessing chronic pain intensity by measuring physiological parameters that correlate with self-reported pain scales.
May support objective chronic pain monitoring in practice; extends systematic validation of physiologic wearables against self-report.
Wearable electronic devices are a convenient solution to pain intensity assessment as they can provide continuous monitoring for more precise medication adjustments. However, there is little evidence regarding the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Our primary objective was to examine the physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We initially inquired PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We updated our inquiry by searching on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. English peer-reviewed studies were included, with no exclusions based on time frame or publication status. Of 348 articles that were identified on the first inquiry, 8 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of 179 articles that were identified on the last inquiry, only 1 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found articles evaluating wristbands, smartwatches, and belts. Parameters evaluated were psychomotor and sleep patterns, space and time mobility, heart rate variability, and skeletal muscle electrical activity. Most of the studies found significant positive associations between physiological parameters measured by wearable electronic devices and self-reporting pain scales. Wearable electronic devices reliably reflect physiologic or biometric parameters, providing a physiological correlation for pain. Early stage investigation suggests that the degree of pain intensity can be discerned, which ideally will reduce the bias inherent to existing numeric/verbal scales. Further research on the use of these devices is vital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ávila et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Chronic pain. Wearable electronic devices vs. Self-reporting pain scales was evaluated on Physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Wearable electronic devices measuring physiologic parameters showed significant positive associations with self-reporting pain scales for chronic pain assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: