Why the study?
Chronic pain intensity is largely perceived as a subjective experience, making its objective measurement challenging despite correlated physiological traces.
Can sensor technologies objectively evaluate the physiological traits of non-oncologic chronic pain?
Can sensor technologies objectively evaluate the physiological traits of non-oncologic chronic pain?
Sensor technologies offer a diversified set of alternatives for the objective measurement of chronic pain through physiological traces.
May aid objective chronic pain phenotyping in research; prospective validation needed before clinical adoption.
Non-oncologic chronic pain is a common high-morbidity impairment worldwide and acknowledged as a condition with significant incidence on quality of life. Pain intensity is largely perceived as a subjective experience, what makes challenging its objective measurement. However, the physiological traces of pain make possible its correlation with vital signs, such as heart rate variability, skin conductance, electromyogram, etc., or health performance metrics derived from daily activity monitoring or facial expressions, which can be acquired with diverse sensor technologies and multisensory approaches. As the assessment and management of pain are essential issues for a wide range of clinical disorders and treatments, this paper reviews different sensor-based approaches applied to the objective evaluation of non-oncological chronic pain. The space of available technologies and resources aimed at pain assessment represent a diversified set of alternatives that can be exploited to address the multidimensional nature of pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naranjo-Hernández et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: