Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Respiratory viral infections remain a major global health challenge, particularly in immunocompromised populations. Although adoptive cell therapies using virus-experienced memory T lymphocytes have demonstrated safety and effectiveness when administered intravenously, the safety profile and feasibility of intranasal delivery of immune effector cells in humans was not previously assessed. Methods vRELEASE I (NCT06699758) represents a phase I, single-center, open-label, dose-escalation study designed to evaluate the safety profile and feasibility of intranasal administration of off-the-shelf, allogeneic CD45RO + /RA − memory T lymphocytes derived from a third-party male donor in healthy female adult volunteers. The study employed a conventional 3+3 dose-escalation design, evaluating three dose levels (1 × 10 6 , 5 × 10 6 , and 10 × 10 6 cells per dose). Each participant received three intranasal administrations at 2-h intervals. Safety assessments included monitoring for adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DTLs). The local persistence of donor-derived cells in the nasal mucosa was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results Intranasal administration was completed as planned in all nine treated participants. No treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in any cohort during the seven-day safety follow-up period. The highest planned dose, 10 × 10 6 cells per administration, was delivered to three participants without DLTs during short-term follow-up. Donor-derived male cells were not detected above the assay detection threshold in evaluable nasal mucosa samples by Y-chromosome FISH. Conclusion In this first-in-human, single-center phase I dose-escalation study, intranasal administration of third-party, ready-to-use, allogeneic CD45RO + /RA − memory T lymphocytes was well tolerated. No treatment-emergent adverse events or DTLs occurred during the seven-day follow-up of nine healthy adult female volunteers, confirming the operational feasibility of the planned dose levels. These preliminary findings support further monitored evaluation in clinically relevant populations, though longer follow-up remains necessary to assess delayed immunological or late adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Akioui‐Sanz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: