Key result
Doppler ultrasound links liquid meal ingestion to a ~38% increase in coeliac axis blood flow.
Why the study?
Can transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound reliably measure coeliac axis blood flow and its physiological changes in normal subjects?
Observational (n=52)
Can transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound reliably measure coeliac axis blood flow and its physiological changes in normal subjects?
Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound provides a reproducible, non-invasive method for quantifying coeliac axis blood flow and its physiological response to food ingestion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports reproducible non-invasive coeliac flow measurement in healthy subjects; leaves open validation for mesenteric disease assessment.
Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound was used to measure coeliac axis blood flow in 42 normal subjects in the fasting state and in 10 subjects following a liquid meal. A Duplex scanner was used and coeliac axis blood flow was estimated by calculating the instantaneous average velocity of blood flow over the cardiac cycle. Both the diameter of the vessel and the angle between the vessel and the beam were measured from real time imaging. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) of coeliac axis blood flow was 703 +/- 24 ml/min. There was no difference in the results between the sexes nor any correlation between flow and age. The mean coefficient of variability was 7.8 per cent in a 1 day test and 9.2 per cent in a 2 day test. Coeliac axis blood flow increased by 38 per cent immediately after the end of ingestion of the meal and declined to 29 per cent 5 min and 24 per cent 10 min later.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qamar et al. (1985) conducted an observational in Normal subjects (n=52). Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Coeliac axis blood flow. Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound measured a mean fasting coeliac axis blood flow of 703 +/- 24 ml/min, which increased by 38% immediately after ingestion of a liquid meal.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: