Key result
Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty during left-sided valve surgery is linked to impaired postoperative RV diastolic function.
Why the study?
The impact of tricuspid regurgitation regulation using tricuspid annuloplasty on postoperative changes in right ventricular systolic and diastolic functions was not clearly elucidated.
Does concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty impact postoperative changes in right ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=45)
Does concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty impact postoperative changes in right ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve surgery?
Tricuspid annuloplasty during left-sided valve surgery may potentially impair right ventricular diastolic function, despite similar recovery of systolic function.
OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the impact of regulation of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) using tricuspid annuloplasty on postoperative changes in right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic functions. METHODS: We enrolled 69 patients who underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery between July 2016 to March 2018 without recurrence. Patients with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or a history of previous cardiovascular surgery were excluded, remaining 45 patients enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty (T: n = 12 vs non-T: n = 33). RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and early tricuspid inflow velocity/early diastolic tricuspid annular velocity ratio (tricuspid E/e') were assessed as functional indices at preoperative, postoperative and 1-year follow-up periods. RESULTS: RVFAC deteriorated postoperatively but recovered at follow-up in group T, whereas that in group non-T showed gradual deterioration overtime. RVGLS and TAPSE showed similar temporary deterioration and recovery between groups. Tricuspid E in group T increased postoperatively and showed significant difference, which was kept until follow-up period. Tricuspid e' decreased postoperatively, and recovered slightly in both groups. As a result, postoperative RV diastolic function (tricuspid E/e') showed significant difference between groups. This difference was maintained until follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RV systolic function deteriorated postoperatively, but there was a tendency to improve at follow-up regardless of tricuspid annuloplasty. RV diastolic function may potentially be impaired when TR was regulated by tricuspid annuloplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakata et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Aortic or mitral valve surgery (n=45). Tricuspid annuloplasty vs. No tricuspid annuloplasty was evaluated on Postoperative changes in right ventricular systolic and diastolic functions. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty during left-sided valve surgery was associated with significantly impaired postoperative right ventricular diastolic function compared to no annuloplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: