Key result
Primary versus secondary severe MR etiology does not impact in-hospital mortality after mitral valve surgery.
Why the study?
Mitral regurgitation is the second most frequent indication for valve surgery, but few studies have evaluated mitral valve surgery in the context of MR etiology.
Does the etiological mechanism of mitral regurgitation (primary vs secondary) impact in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=337)
No
Does the etiological mechanism of mitral regurgitation (primary vs secondary) impact in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
In-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes after mitral valve surgery for severe MR are driven by patient comorbidities and procedure type rather than the primary versus secondary etiology of the regurgitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Etiology of severe MR does not influence in-hospital mortality or complications after surgery; leaves open whether mechanism should guide procedural selection or long-term management.
BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most frequent indication for valve surgery. There are few studies addressing mitral valve (MV) surgery in the context of etiology of MR. AIMS: We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes in the context of the etiological mechanism of MR in patients after MV surgery. METHODS: The study group included 337 consecutive patients with severe MR. Preoperative comorbidities, postoperative clinical course, and predictors of in‑hospital mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Primary etiology of MR was observed in 72% of patients, and of secondary, in 28% (P <0.001). Among the primary MR group, the most common etiological factor was fibroelastic deficiency (79%), followed by Barlow disease (16%) and rheumatic disease (5%) (P <0.001). Secondary MR was seen in ischemic heart disease (67%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (33%) (P <0.001). The incidence of death and complications following surgery did not differ between the groups. Univariate analysis revealed that higher risk of death was associated with older age, severe heart failure symptoms, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, previous percutaneous coronary interventions, cardiopulmonary bypass time, low cardiac output syndrome, and wound infections (P = 0.004, P <0.001, P = 0.005, P = 0.009, P = 0.002, P = 0.006, and P = 0.03, respectively). Also MV replacement with concomitant other valve surgery increased the risk of mortality (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the clinical outcomes and in‑hospital mortality in patients with severe MR correlate with the type of procedure and concomitant perioperative comorbidities rather than the etiological mechanism of MR itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rzucidło-Resil et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=337). Primary mitral regurgitation vs. Secondary mitral regurgitation was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.13). The etiological mechanism of severe mitral regurgitation (primary vs. secondary) did not significantly impact in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs 2.1%, p=0.13) after mitral valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: