Key result
Thiopental sedation in the elderly is linked to ~463% higher hypoxia odds versus non-elderly patients.
Why the study?
The incidence and characteristics of thiopental-related adverse events in elderly patients during procedural sedation and analgesia had not been well studied.
Does the incidence of adverse events differ between elderly and non-elderly patients receiving thiopental for procedural sedation and analgesia?
Observational (n=311)
Yes
Does the incidence of adverse events differ between elderly and non-elderly patients receiving thiopental for procedural sedation and analgesia?
Odds Ratio: 5.63 (95% CI 1.27–25)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.3% vs 2.2%
Elderly patients undergoing procedural sedation with thiopental for cardioversion are at a significantly higher risk of hypoxia compared to non-elderly patients, despite receiving lower weight-based doses.
Elderly patients warrant heightened hypoxia vigilance during thiopental PSA despite lower dosing; leaves open optimal strategies in this observational registry analysis.
Aim: The incidence and characteristics of thiopental-related adverse events (AEs) in elderly patients during procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) have not been well studied. We aimed to characterize thiopental-related AE in elderly patients during PSA and compare the incidence of AE in elderly patients with non-elderly adults. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Japanese Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Registry (JPSTAR). We included all adult patients who received thiopental for PSA in the emergency departments and excluded patients who received concomitant sedative(s) in addition to thiopental or patients with missing body weight data. We compared the incidence of AE between the non-elderly (18-64 years) and elderly groups (≥65 years). Results: The JPSTAR had data on 379 patients who received thiopental for PSA and included 311 patients for analysis. Most (222/311, 71.3%) were elderly. Cardioversion was the most common reason for PSA (96.1%). The AE incidence between groups overall was similar, however, hypoxia was significantly more frequent in the elderly compared with the non-elderly group (10.3% versus 2.2%; adjusted odds 5.63, 95% confidence interval 1.27-25.0). The initial and total doses of thiopental were significantly lower in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (1.95 mg/kg versus 2.21 mg/kg and 2.33 mg/kg versus 2.93 mg/kg, respectively). Conclusions: Although elderly patients received lower doses of thiopental, hypoxic events were significantly more frequent in this group compared with the non-elderly patients. However, the AE incidence was similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for cardioversion (n=311). Elderly age (≥65 years) vs. Non-elderly adults (18-64 years) was evaluated on Hypoxia (adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.27-25.0). Elderly patients receiving thiopental for procedural sedation had a significantly higher incidence of hypoxia compared to non-elderly patients (10.3% vs 2.2%; adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.27-25.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: