Key result
Lay observer blood pressure training yields readings within ~0.4 mmHg of expert measurements.
Why the study?
Does a blood pressure measurement training programme enable lay observers to measure blood pressure as accurately as experts?
Observational (n=25)
Does a blood pressure measurement training programme enable lay observers to measure blood pressure as accurately as experts?
Lay observers can be trained to measure blood pressure with accuracy and inter-observer variability comparable to professional health-care workers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trained lay observers achieve expert-comparable BP accuracy; supports community surveys but should not yet change clinical practice.
This study assessed a training programme attended by 25 observers, intentionally chosen for their lay status, who were invited to participate in a prevalence of hypertension study. The results highlight the fact that the 14 trainee observers finally selected were comparable to professionals in terms of both the estimated validity of the blood pressure measurement [the mean difference (standard deviation) compared with the expert being -0.4 (1.8) mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 0.0 (1.8) mmHg for diastolic blood pressure] and estimated inter-observer variability (100% of the observers complying with the criteria recommended for professional health-care workers), even though the training given to the former was in no way more comprehensive than or distinct from that recommended for professional health-care workers in community studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graciani et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement (n=25). Blood pressure measurement training programme vs. Expert/professional health-care workers was evaluated on Validity of blood pressure measurement (mean difference compared with expert) (MD -0.4 mmHg for SBP, 0.0 mmHg for DBP). A blood pressure measurement training programme for lay observers resulted in validity comparable to experts, with a mean difference of -0.4 mmHg for systolic and 0.0 mmHg for diastolic pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: