Key result
High Medicare bed share is not associated with differential 30-day AMI or HF readmission changes.
Why the study?
Medicare HRRP performance-based penalties risk unintended financial burden on hospitals caring for larger proportions of Medicare patients, prompting evaluation of how Medicare bed share correlates with 30-day readmissions.
Does a higher Medicare bed share (and thus higher potential financial penalty) improve 30-day readmission rates following the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in US hospitals?
Observational (n=1,904)
Yes
Does a higher Medicare bed share (and thus higher potential financial penalty) improve 30-day readmission rates following the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in US hospitals?
Mean Difference: -0.11 (95% CI -0.26–0.04)
Absolute Event Rate: -1.47% vs -1.35%
The magnitude of financial burden from HRRP penalties, as captured by a hospital's Medicare bed share, was not associated with the extent of reduction in 30-day readmissions for AMI, HF, and pneumonia.
HRRP penalties showed no association with readmission reductions by Medicare bed share; leaves open whether penalty magnitude drives program effects.
BACKGROUND: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), implemented beginning in 2013, seeks to incentivize Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) hospitals to reduce 30-day readmissions for selected inpatient cohorts including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Performance-based penalties, which take the form of a percentage reduction in Medicare reimbursement for all inpatient care services, have a risk of unintended financial burden on hospitals that care for a larger proportion of Medicare patients. To examine the role of this unintended risk on 30-day readmissions, we estimated the association between the extent of their Medicare share of total hospital bed days and changes in 30-day readmissions. METHODS: We used publicly available nationwide hospital level data for 2009-2016 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare program, CMS Final Impact Rule, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach, we compared pre- vs. post-HRRP changes in 30-day readmission rate in hospitals with high and moderate Medicare share of total hospital bed days ("Medicare bed share") vs. low Medicare bed share hospitals. RESULTS: We grouped the 1904 study hospitals into tertiles (low, moderate and high) by Medicare bed share; the average bed share in the three tertile groups was 31.2, 47.8 and 59.9%, respectively. Compared to low Medicare bed share hospitals, high bed share hospitals were more likely to be non-profit, have smaller bed size and less likely to be a teaching hospital. High bed share hospitals were more likely to be in rural and non-large-urban areas, have fewer lower income patients and have a less complex patient case-mix profile. At baseline, the average readmissions rate in the low Medicare bed share (control) hospitals was 20.0% (AMI), 24.7% (HF) and 18.4% (pneumonia). The observed pre- to post-program change in the control hospitals was - 1.35% (AMI), - 1.02% (HF) and - 0.35% (pneumonia). Difference in differences model estimates indicated no differential change in readmissions among moderate and high Medicare bed share hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: HRRP penalties were not associated with any change in readmissions rate. The CMS should consider alternative options - including working collaboratively with hospitals - to reduce readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banerjee et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia (n=1,904). High Medicare bed share vs. Low Medicare bed share was evaluated on Difference-in-differences in 30-day risk-adjusted readmission rate for acute myocardial infarction (MD -0.11, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.04). High Medicare bed share was not associated with a differential change in 30-day readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia following the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program compared to low Medicare bed share.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: