Key result
Cardiovascular prevention program proves cost-effective vs usual care at ~26,910 euros per QALY.
Why the study?
Does a cardiovascular prevention program improve cost-utility compared to usual care in highly educated adults?
RCT (n=314)
randomly assigned
Does a cardiovascular prevention program improve cost-utility compared to usual care in highly educated adults?
Effect estimate: ICER 26,910 euros per QALY
A cardiovascular prevention program combining medical and behavioral interventions demonstrated cost-effectiveness at 1 year in highly educated adults.
Supports implementation in educated adults now; extends short-term cost-utility RCT evidence.
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the costs and the effects of cardiovascular prevention programs targeted at medical and behavioral risk factors. The aim was to evaluate the cost-utility of a cardiovascular prevention program in a general sample of highly educated adults after 1 year of intervention. METHODS: The participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 208) and usual care conditions (n = 106). The intervention consisted of medical interventions and optional behavior-change interventions (e.g., a tailored Web site). Cost data were registered from a healthcare perspective, and questionnaires were used to determine effectiveness (e.g., quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). A cost-utility analysis and sensitivity analyses using bootstrapping were performed on the intermediate results. RESULTS: When adjusting for baseline utility differences, the incremental cost was 433 euros and the incremental effectiveness was 0.016 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 26,910 euros per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was cost-effective compared with usual care in this sample of highly educated adults after 1 year of intervention. Increased participation would make this intervention highly cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobs et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular risk (n=314). Cardiovascular prevention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Cost-utility (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY) (ICER 26,910 euros per QALY). A cardiovascular prevention program in highly educated adults was cost-effective compared to usual care at 1 year, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 26,910 euros per QALY.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: