Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 1995Journal of Internal Medicine

The cost‐effectiveness of a cardiovascular multiple‐risk‐factor intervention programme in treated hypertensive men

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does a comprehensive multiple-risk factor modification programme improve cost-effectiveness (incremental cost per life-year gained) in treated hypertensive men with additional risk factors?

Population

508 treated hypertensive men, age 50-72 years, with at least one of the following: serum cholesterol ≥ 6.5…

Comparison

Comprehensive, multiple-risk factor modification… vs Conventional treatment.

Design

RCT, randomized, parallel-group, open

Follow-up

3 years

Authors

Magnus Johannesson
Magnus JohannessonStockholm School of Economics
SAStefan AgewallPreventive CardiologyMHMarianne HartfordUniversity of Gothenburg

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports adoption of multiple-risk factor programs in high-risk hypertensive men; confirms cost-effectiveness using observed outcomes over modeled estimates.

Structured PICO

Does a comprehensive multiple-risk factor modification programme improve cost-effectiveness (incremental cost per life-year gained) in treated hypertensive men with additional risk factors?

P
Population
508 treated hypertensive men, age 50-72 (mean 66.4) years, with at least one of the following: serum cholesterol ≥ 6.5 mmol/L, smoking, or diabetes mellitus.
I
Intervention
Comprehensive, multiple-risk factor modification programme including individual advice, group meetings based on nutritional advice and behavioural treatment principles, and drug therapy if necessary to achieve treatment goals (serum total cholesterol < 6.0 mmol/L, no smoking, HbA1c < 6.0%, and diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg).
C
Comparator
Conventional treatment.
O
Outcome
Incremental cost per life-year gained of the intervention programme.

A comprehensive multiple-risk factor modification program is cost-effective in treated hypertensive men with additional cardiovascular risk factors.

Cite This Study

Johannesson et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a86d7786fbb37794f7cb00chttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01135.x

Topics

Hypertension management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening for Hypertension1990 · 175 citations
  2. 2Plasma lipoprotein levels in treated and untreated hypertensive men and women. The National Heart Foundation of Australia Risk Factor Prevalence Study.1985 · 123 citations
  3. 3Economic consequences of postinfarction prophylaxis with beta blockers: cost effectiveness of metoprolol.1987 · 32 citations
  4. 4Cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis—a randomized study of intravenous rt-PA in suspected myocardial infarction1992 · 56 citations
  5. 5Hyperinsulinaemia and other metabolic disturbances in well-controlled hypertensive men and women: an epidemiological study of the Dalby population1990 · 54 citations