Key result
Symptomatic carotid plaques show a ~43% higher median lipid percentage than asymptomatic plaques.
Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance T2 mapping of carotid plaque lipid content and distribution differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease?
Observational (n=50)
Single-blind
No
Does magnetic resonance T2 mapping of carotid plaque lipid content and distribution differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease?
Non-invasive MRI T2 mapping demonstrates that carotid plaque lipid content and coalesced distribution are significantly higher in symptomatic patients, independent of the degree of luminal stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Plaque lipid on T2-mapping was associated with symptoms independent of stenosis; leaves open its utility for stratifying asymptomatic carotid disease.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Techniques to stratify subgroups of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease are urgently needed to guide decisions on optimal treatment. Reliance on estimates of % luminal stenosis has not been effective, perhaps because that approach entirely disregards potentially important information on the pathological process in the wall of the artery. METHODS: Since plaque lipid is a key determinant of plaque behaviour we used a newly validated, high-sensitivity T2-mapping MR technique for a systematic survey of the quantity and distribution of plaque lipid in patients undergoing endarterectomy. Lipid percentage was quantified in 50 carotid endarterectomy patients. Lipid distribution was tested, using two imaging indices (contribution of the largest lipid deposit towards total lipid (LLD %) and a newly-developed LAI 'lipid aggregation index'). RESULTS: The bifurcation contained maximal lipid volume. Lipid percentage was higher in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients with degree of stenosis (DS ≥ 50%) and in the total cohort (P = 0.013 and P = 0.005, respectively). Both LLD % and LAI was higher in symptomatic patients (P = 0.028 and P = 0.018, respectively), suggesting that for a given plaque lipid volume, coalesced deposits were more likely to be associated with symptomatic events. There was no correlation between plaque volume or lipid content and degree of luminal stenosis measured on ultrasound duplex (r = -0.09, P = 0.53 and r = -0.05, P = 0.75), respectively. However, there was a strong correlation in lipid between left and right carotid arteries (r = 0.5, P <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Plaque lipid content and distribution is associated with symptomatic status of the carotid plaque. Importantly, plaque lipid content was not related to the degree of luminal stenosis assessed by ultrasound. Determination of plaque lipid content may prove useful for stratification of asymptomatic patients, including selection of optimal invasive treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkhalil et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Carotid artery disease (n=50). Symptomatic carotid plaque vs. Asymptomatic carotid plaque was evaluated on Plaque lipid percentage in slice with maximal lipid content (p=0.013). Symptomatic carotid plaques had a higher median lipid percentage compared to asymptomatic plaques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: