Key result
Right common carotid assessment yields comparable cIMT to the left for evaluating atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
Does the right common carotid artery provide comparable structural and functional measurements to the left common carotid artery in children and adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=230)
Does the right common carotid artery provide comparable structural and functional measurements to the left common carotid artery in children and adolescents?
The right common carotid artery is a viable alternative measurement location for subclinical atherosclerosis in youth if the left is inaccessible, as most structural and functional measures are comparable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports interchangeable left/right carotid use for most youth ultrasound measures when one side is inaccessible; leaves open side-specific norms for lumen diameter.
The carotid artery represents an ideal location for noninvasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in youth. Examination of arterial structure and function is generally conducted in the left common carotid. However, if the left common carotid is inaccessible or provides a poor acoustic window, it is unknown if the right common carotid can provide comparable values. The symmetry of carotid arteries in youth with high-resolution ultrasound was compared. Participants (N=230 [121 females], 13.8±2.9 years old) were assessed for carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), carotid lumen diameter (cLD), carotid incremental elastic modulus (cIEM), carotid diameter compliance (cDC), carotid cross-sectional compliance (cCSC), carotid diameter distensibility (cDD), and carotid cross-sectional distensibility (cCSD). No significant differences ( P >0.05 all) were found for cIMT (0.49±0.09 vs 0.49±0.08 mm), cIEM (1095±382 vs 1116±346 mmHg), cDC (0.01±0.0 vs 0.01±0.0 mm/mmHg), cCSC (0.01±0.001/mmHg vs 0.01±0.001/mmHg), cDD (14.0%±3.16% vs 13.7%±3.18%), and cCSD (30.1%±7.37% vs 29.4%±7.36%). Significant differences were found for cLD (6.06±0.62 mm vs 6.33±0.64 mm, P <0.001). The majority of measures for arterial structure and function are comparable between the left and right common carotid arteries. There were differences present for cLD; however, these discrepancies are likely due to anatomical differences between the left and right common carotid arteries. Therefore, if the left common carotid is unable to be assessed properly, the right common carotid may be a viable alternative measurement location of subclinical atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uithoven et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=230). Right common carotid artery assessment vs. Left common carotid artery assessment was evaluated on carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) (p=>0.05). Assessment of the right common carotid artery yielded comparable cIMT to the left common carotid (0.49 vs 0.49 mm, P>0.05), suggesting it is a viable alternative for evaluating atherosclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: