Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging successfully established the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) secondary to type 2 spontaneous coronary artery dissection after an inconclusive coronary angiogram.
Why the study?
Evaluating ACS in young women is clinically challenging because an unremarkable coronary angiogram may miss spontaneous coronary dissection or resolved spasm.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging establish the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in a young woman with inconclusive coronary angiography?
Case Report (n=1)
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging establish the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in a young woman with inconclusive coronary angiography?
CMR is a valuable diagnostic imaging modality for confirming acute MI and establishing its etiology, such as SCAD, when coronary angiography is inconclusive.
CMR may clarify ACS etiology after inconclusive angiography in young women; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Evaluation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in young women presents a clinical challenge. An unremarkable coronary angiogram may not exclude ACS, as spontaneous lesion revascularization, resolved coronary spams, or spontaneous coronary dissection (SCAD) can often be missed. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can provide useful information in acute myocardial infarction (MI) by confirming and sizing acute infarction and delineating the etiology when angiography is inconclusive. Here, we report a case of a 39-year-old postpartum woman with a history of hyperlipidemia who presented with a one-day history of atypical angina. On presentation, she was found to have transient ST-segment elevation in high lateral leads and elevated troponin. Coronary angiography revealed a nonobstructive lesion in the first obtuse marginal branch (OM1) distribution. The patient subsequently underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for further delineation of etiology, which confirmed acute infarction in the OM1 distribution. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) secondary to acute coronary artery dissection type 2 (SCAD-2) was made. The patient was managed conservatively with medical therapy. CMR has emerged as a front-line diagnostic imaging modality in acute MI and can provide invaluable information in the confirmation and sizing of infarction, delineating tissue characteristics, establishing the etiology of infarction, and prognostication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassab et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MINOCA) (n=1). Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnosis of etiology of acute myocardial infarction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging successfully established the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) secondary to type 2 spontaneous coronary artery dissection after an inconclusive coronary angiogram.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: