Key result
Sirolimus use in kidney transplant recipients shows no association with MACE compared to non-use.
Why the study?
Kidney transplant recipients face high risk for cardiovascular disease from long-term immunosuppression, motivating evaluation of the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes.
Does sirolimus affect the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=7,180)
Yes
Does sirolimus affect the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 0.77–2.55)
Sirolimus does not significantly increase overall cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients but is associated with a markedly increased risk of MACE in patients with pre-existing congestive heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular outcomes in Korean KTRs. METHODS: From a cohort of 7180 eligible KTRs identified from 2010 to 2021, 387 KTRs who received sirolimus were included. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was applied, and the landmark method was used to address immortal time bias. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The analysis showed no significant difference in MACE between the sirolimus-treated and untreated groups (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, .77-2.55), despite a higher incidence of dyslipidaemia in the sirolimus-treated group. However, subgroup analysis revealed an increased MACE risk in KTRs with pre-transplant congestive heart failure (CHF) who were treated with sirolimus (hazard ratio, 6.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-21.74), while no significant differences were found in other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that while sirolimus can be a viable option for immunosuppression, it should be used cautiously in those with pre-existing CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Kidney transplant recipients (n=7,180). Sirolimus vs. Untreated group was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.77-2.55). Sirolimus use in kidney transplant recipients was not significantly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events compared to non-use (HR 1.40; 95% CI 0.77-2.55).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: