Key result
Invasive fractional pulse pressure links to ~87% higher AKI risk in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
Acute kidney injury is prevalent and linked to poor outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, and high pulse pressure is associated with adverse cardiovascular events.
Is invasively measured fractional pulse pressure associated with acute kidney injury in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Cohort (n=1,170)
Is invasively measured fractional pulse pressure associated with acute kidney injury in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Odds Ratio: 1.874 (95% CI 1.513–2.322)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Invasively measured fractional pulse pressure is an independent predictor of acute kidney injury in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI), which is prevalent in ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. As high pulse pressure (PP) is associated with adverse cardiovascular events, the present study's aim was to evaluate the relationship between fractional PP (PPf) and AKI in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All laboratory findings as well as echocardiographic and angiographic data of 1,170 consecutive STEMI patients were retrospectively screened. PPf was calculated from the pressures invasively measured after sheath insertion and before performing coronary angiography. RESULTS: From 1,170 eligible STEMI patients (mean age 56 years, 18.2% female), AKI developed in 143 (12.2%) patients. The PPf and pulsatility index were significantly higher in patients with AKI than those without (0.53 ± 0.10 vs. 0.61 ± 0.10, p < 0.001, and 0.80 ± 0.03 vs. 0.82 ± 0.03, p < 0.001, respectively). PPf was also found to be associated with AKI in univariable (OR 2.183, 95% CI 1.823-2.614, p< 0.001) and multivariable (OR 1.874, 95% CI 1.513-2.322, p < 0.001) analysis. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with AKI than those without. CONCLUSION: Invasively measured PPf, which can be easily measured and has no additional cost in STEMI patients undergoing coronary intervention, is an independent predictor of AKI. In addition, PPf is superior to other blood pressure values and derivatives in AKI prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burak et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,170). Fractional pulse pressure (PPf) vs. Lower fractional pulse pressure was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 1.874, 95% CI 1.513-2.322, p=< 0.001). Invasively measured fractional pulse pressure was independently associated with acute kidney injury in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (OR 1.874; 95% CI 1.513-2.322; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: