Key result
Left and right VNS yield similar LVEF improvements in HFrEF at six months.
Why the study?
Does autonomic regulation therapy via left or right vagus nerve stimulation improve cardiac function and symptoms in patients with HFrEF?
RCT (n=60)
Left or right side
Yes
Does autonomic regulation therapy via left or right vagus nerve stimulation improve cardiac function and symptoms in patients with HFrEF?
Autonomic regulation therapy via left or right vagus nerve stimulation is feasible, well-tolerated, and associated with improvements in cardiac structure and function in patients with HFrEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports flexible left or right vagus nerve stimulation in HFrEF; extends evidence confirming side equivalence for autonomic regulation therapy.
OBJECTIVE: ANTHEM-HF evaluated a novel autonomic regulation therapy (ART) via either left or right vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty subjects (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≥ 50 mm to < 80 mm) receiving optimal pharmacologic therapy were randomized at 10 sites. VNS systems were randomly implanted on the left (n = 31) or right (n = 29) side. All patients were successfully implanted and 59 were titrated over 10 weeks to a well tolerated stimulation intensity. One patient died 3 days after an embolic stroke that occurred during implantation. Common device-related adverse events after VNS titration were transient mild dysphonia, cough, and oropharyngeal pain, which were similar for left- and right-side VNS. After 6 months of ART, the adjusted left-right differences in LVEF, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were 0.2% (95% CI -4.4 to 4.7), 3.7 mL (95% CI -7.0 to 14.4), and 1.3 mm (95% CI -0.9 to 3.6), respectively. In the combined population, absolute LVEF improved by 4.5% (95% CI 2.4-6.6), LVESV improved by -4.1 mL (95% CI -9.0 to 0.8), and LVESD improved by -1.7 mm (95% CI -2.8 to -0.7). Heart rate variability improved by 17 ms (95% CI 6.5-28) with minimal left-right difference. Six-minute walk distance improved an average of 56 m (95% CI 37-75); however, improvement was greater for right-side ART (77 m [95% CI 49-105]). NYHA functional class improved in 77% of patients (baseline to 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic open-loop ART via left- or right-side VNS is feasible and well tolerated in HFrEF patients. Safety and efficacy measures are encouraging and warrant further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Premchand et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=60). Autonomic regulation therapy via vagus nerve stimulation vs. Left vs Right side was evaluated on Adjusted left-right difference in LVEF (MD 0.2%, 95% CI -4.4 to 4.7). Autonomic regulation therapy via left or right vagus nerve stimulation in HFrEF patients showed similar improvements in LVEF (adjusted left-right difference 0.2%; 95% CI -4.4 to 4.7) at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: