Key result
Continuous retrograde infraclavicular block achieves a ~94% complete block rate versus the axillary approach.
Why the study?
Does continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block using retrograde insertion improve the quality of block compared to Selander's continuous axillary approach in patients scheduled for surgery?
RCT (n=32)
Randomly assigned
Does continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block using retrograde insertion improve the quality of block compared to Selander's continuous axillary approach in patients scheduled for surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 93.75% vs 50%
p-value: p=<0.05
Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block via retrograde axillary insertion improves block quality compared to the standard axillary approach.
Supports retrograde infraclavicular continuous blocks for higher success; extends RCT comparisons of axillary versus infraclavicular catheter techniques.
Background: The continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) has many merits compared to other approaches. However, due to complications and the discomfort felt by patients during the procedure, it has not gained much in popularity. We assumed that the neurovascular sheath is one compartment and placed the catheter deeply into the sheath, as used in the infraclavicular approach, through the axilla. Methods: Patients scheduled for surgery were paired according to their diagnoses and sites of surgery. Thirty-two patients were randomly chosen and divided into two groups. Selander's continuous axillary BPB was performed in the axillary group. In the infraclavicular group, we inserted an epidural catheter with a stylet deeper into the site just medial to the coracoid process using a C-arm and nerve stimulator. Results: In the infraclavicular group, sensory and motor block of the musculocutaneous nerve and the quality of BPB was superior to those of the axillary group (P < 0.05). The average depth of the catheter from the skin was cm. Conclusions: Continuous infraclavicular BPB can cause no more discomfort as Selander's continuous axillary approach. Furthermore, it may improve the quality of block and reduce the amount of local anesthetic used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Patients scheduled for hand and forearm surgery (n=32). Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block using retrograde insertion of an epidural catheter with stylet vs. Selander's continuous axillary brachial plexus block was evaluated on Quality of brachial plexus block (rate of complete block) (p=<0.05). Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a retrograde epidural catheter significantly improved the rate of complete block (93.75% vs 50.0%) compared to the axillary approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: