Key result
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography-derived diastolic deceleration time < 185 ms detected no-reflow with 95.5% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity, outperforming other standard modalities.
Why the study?
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect no-reflow in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction compared to angiographic, electrocardiographic, and enzymatic indices?
Observational (n=94)
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect no-reflow in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction compared to angiographic, electrocardiographic, and enzymatic indices?
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, specifically measuring diastolic deceleration time, provides a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive method to detect no-reflow after anterior myocardial infarction.
May support noninvasive no-reflow detection by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography after anterior MI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: Doppler guidewire studies demonstrated that the no-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction is associated with characteristic coronary blood flow pattern. We investigated the potential of coronary flow measurement with transthoracic Doppler technique to detect the no-flow in the patients with reperfused infarction, and compared it to that of other modalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography after successful primary coronary intervention in the 94 patients with first, anterior wall infarction. Coronary blood flow in the left anterior descending artery was detected with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography within 24 h after reperfusion in 83 patients (88.3%). Twenty-two patients with the no-reflow had significantly lower systolic peak velocity (5.1 +/- 4.2 vs. 8.1 +/- 6.2 cm/s, p = 0.04), higher diastolic peak velocity (38.2 +/- 10.3 vs. 30.8 +/- 15.7 cm/s; p = 0.04), and shorter diastolic deceleration time (134 +/- 41 vs. 424 +/- 202 ms; p < 0.0001) than those with good-reflow. Systolic flow reversal was more frequently observed in those with no-reflow (18.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0 .02). Diastolic deceleration time < 185 ms detected the no-reflow with far higher sensitivity/specificity (95.5%/95.1%) than TIMI frame count (45.5%/91.8%), ST resolution (54.5%/73.8%) and creatinine kinase-MB (54.5%/88.5%). CONCLUSION: Analysing coronary blood flow pattern can detect the no-reflow after anterior infarction better than other angiographic, electrocardiographic and enzymatic modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwakura et al. (2004) conducted an observational in reperfused anterior myocardial infarction (n=94). Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography vs. TIMI frame count, ST resolution, and creatinine kinase-MB was evaluated on Detection of no-reflow phenomenon. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography-derived diastolic deceleration time < 185 ms detected no-reflow with 95.5% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity, outperforming other standard modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: