Key result
Computational models predict greater proarrhythmia risk with d-sotalol versus l-sotalol despite comparable hERG binding.
Why the study?
Drug isomers may differ in proarrhythmia risk, such as sotalol enantiomers that both block the hERG cardiac potassium channel but confer differing degrees of risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A multi-scale computational modeling pipeline successfully predicted the increased proarrhythmic risk of d-sotalol compared to l-sotalol by accounting for stereospecific beta-adrenergic receptor blocking.
Drug isomers may differ in their proarrhythmia risk. An interesting example is the drug sotalol, an antiarrhythmic drug comprising d- and l- enantiomers that both block the hERG cardiac potassium channel and confer differing degrees of proarrhythmic risk. We developed a multi-scale in silico pipeline focusing on hERG channel - drug interactions and used it to probe and predict the mechanisms of pro-arrhythmia risks of the two enantiomers of sotalol. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations predicted comparable hERG channel binding affinities for d- and l-sotalol, which were validated with electrophysiology experiments. MD derived thermodynamic and kinetic parameters were used to build multi-scale functional computational models of cardiac electrophysiology at the cell and tissue scales. Functional models were used to predict inactivated state binding affinities to recapitulate electrocardiogram (ECG) QT interval prolongation observed in clinical data. Our study demonstrates how modeling and simulation can be applied to predict drug effects from the atom to the rhythm for dl-sotalol and also increased proarrhythmia proclivity of d- vs. l-sotalol when accounting for stereospecific beta-adrenergic receptor blocking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeMarco et al. (2021) studied Pro-arrhythmia risk. d- and l-sotalol vs. d- vs. l-sotalol was evaluated on hERG channel binding affinities and proarrhythmia proclivity. Multi-scale computational modeling predicted comparable hERG channel binding affinities for d- and l-sotalol, but increased proarrhythmia proclivity of d- vs. l-sotalol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: