Cross-Sectional (n=417)
No
Ineffective dialogue and weak guidance from health professionals are associated with inadequate follow-up and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.
May prompt communication training in hypertension care; leaves open whether it improves follow-up adherence.
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the adherence and associate it to blood pressure control and to follow-up observation of people with hypertension in the Brazil's Family Health Strategy. METHOD: cross-sectional study, conducted with 417 people in treatment of hypertension, living in a municipality located in the Northwest region of the state of Paraná, Brazil. The data were collected in the first 2016 semester, using an instrument adapted and validated for the evaluation of satisfaction with the services offered by Primary Health Care. Analysis of variance and the logistic regression model were used for the treatment of variables. RESULTS: it was evidenced that people with inadequate follow-up observation evaluate the relations between professional/user and the guidance to the medications used as unsatisfactory. CONCLUSION: weak guidelines and ineffective dialogue between health professionals and users might result in an inadequate follow-up observation of blood pressure control and of people with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rêgo et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in hypertension (n=417). Inadequate follow-up observation was evaluated on Adherence and its association to blood pressure control and follow-up observation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: