Key result
Papillary muscle fibers in mitral valve incompetence exhibit ~39% higher calcium-time integral versus stenosis.
Observational (n=27)
Absolute Event Rate: 165% vs 119%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Diastolic calcium overload may occur during shortening in mitral incompetence; leaves open calcium modulation as a research target before any clinical translation.
It was the aim of the present study to analyze left-ventricular contractile behaviour (force development, shortening) and intracellular calcium handling using afterloaded contractions of papillary muscle fibres from patients operated upon for mitral valve stenosis (MVS, n = 12) or mitral valve incompetence (MVI, n = 15). Isometric force development and passive resting tension at Lmax were similar in MVI and MVS (n.s.). Isotonic shortening amplitudes were reduced in MVI (p < 0.0001) compared to MVS. The peak intracellular calcium transient (ICT) preceeded the maximum force- and shortening amplitude in MVI and MVS. The amplitude of the ICT rose with decreasing afterload, became broader during shortening and presented a prolongation of the diastolic decay. Those differences were much more pronounced in MVI. The calcium-time integral (CTI) at minimal load (isotonic contraction) was 119 +/- 5% in MVS and 165 +/- 14% in MVI (p < 0.0001). The data reveal a severe diastolic calcium overload during shortening in left-ventricular MVI myocardium. An increased dissociation rate of calcium from the contractile proteins during shortening, a depressed calcium re-uptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum during shortening, or altered mechanosensitive ion channels in MVI may be involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonz et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Mitral valve disease (n=27). Mitral valve incompetence vs. Mitral valve stenosis was evaluated on Calcium-time integral (CTI) at minimal load (isotonic contraction) (p=<0.0001). Papillary muscle fibres from patients with mitral valve incompetence exhibited a significantly higher calcium-time integral at minimal load compared to mitral valve stenosis (165% vs 119%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: